Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sysadmin Todo List"
From Nuclear Physics Group Documentation Pages
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|- | |- | ||
| lentil | | lentil | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|-| | |-| | ||
| gourd | | gourd | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|-| | |-| | ||
| roentgen | | roentgen | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| no | | no | ||
| − | | | + | | no |
|-| | |-| | ||
| taro | | taro | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| no | | no | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|-| | |-| | ||
| pepper | | pepper | ||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| no | | no | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|-| | |-| | ||
| jalapeno | | jalapeno | ||
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
| no | | no | ||
| no | | no | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|-| | |-| | ||
| tomato | | tomato | ||
| Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|- | |- | ||
| okra | | okra | ||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| yes | | yes | ||
| − | | | + | | yes |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Revision as of 19:44, 10 July 2007
It'd probably be good to clean up the "Completed" list at the end of each month by moving the current list to its own page. --Steve 14:18, 22 June 2007 (EDT)
Access Control
Chart of what groups can log onto what machines:
| name | restricted by access.conf | nogroup | npg | farm | domain_admins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| einstein | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| lentil | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| gourd | yes | no | yes | yes | yes |
| roentgen | yes | no | yes | no | no |
| taro | yes | no | yes | no | yes |
| pepper | yes | no | no | yes | yes |
| jalapeno | yes | no | no | no | yes |
| tomato | no | yes | yes | yes | yes |
| okra | yes* | yes | yes | yes | yes |
* : needs reloaded
There seems to be a corellation; /etc/security/access.conf seems to be working as intended. --Steve 15:01, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
